Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9514: A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT) in the management of high risk (HR), high grade (HG) soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and body wall
Reviewer: Neha Vapiwala, MD
Last Modified: June 1, 2003
Presenter: W. G. Kraybill Presenter's Affiliation: RTOG Type of Session: Scientific
The preliminary data from this RTOG phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in high risk soft tissue sarcoma patients was first presented at ASCO a few years ago. This presentation is an update of that data including analysis of all pts with longer follow-up to evaluate toxicity, complication rates, and efficacy rates
Materials and Methods
66 pts enrolled with primary high grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities (81%) or body wall (19%), measuring > 8 cm in diameter
64 pts analyzed for toxicity, response rate, complication rate and treatment failure
- "failure" defined as persistent local disease, disease relapse or surgical amputation
Protocol specified the following treatment regimen:
1) preoperative modified MAID chemotherapy (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide, DTIC) x 3 cycles
2) radiation of 44 Gy given in split courses of 22 Gy between chemo cycles; boost of 16 Gy for postive margins postoperatively
3) surgical resection
4) postoperative modified MAID chemotherapy x 3 cycles
3-yr overall survival of 75%
3-yr distant disease-free survival of 64.4%
3-yr disease-free survival of 55.2%
14 deaths, 11 were sarcoma-specific and 1 was treatment-related
3-yr treatment failure rate of 20%
Failure rates by surgical outcome:
- 52 pts with clear margins --> 3 (6%) failed
- 3 pts with involved margins --> 2 failed
- 5 pts with amputation --> all 5 failed
- 4 pts did not get surgery --> 3 failed, 1 had complete response after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation alone
Delayed wound healing seen in 31%, but serious or severe degree seen only in 11%, as rest were minimal delays
The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation with additional postoperative chemotherapy for large, high grade soft tissue sarcomas appears to be feasible in this multi-institutional study.
The regimen has considerable toxicity but is still possible with careful assessment and management of any treatment complications.
In light of the overall and distant disease-free survival rates seen here, there appears to be efficacy of this aggressive combined modality approach in high risk pts.
The treatment approach in high risk soft tissue sarcoma patients is an evolving one. This study shows updated survival data suggesting a benefit with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation as well as postoperative consolidation chemotherapy in these patients. The toxicity profile of such an approach must be weighed against the potential benefit and likelihood of downstaging prior to surgery on an individualized basis. Treatment failure in these high risk patients is likely a multifactorial process rather than a shortcoming of any single modality. A separate analysis of those patients completing the entire treatment as per protocol might help to shed some light on this matter.
Oncolink's ASCO Coverage made possible by an unrestricted Educational Grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology.
Sep 22, 2011 - Tumor necrosis factor-α and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion therapy has a limb salvage rate of 81 percent in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas who would have otherwise undergone amputation, according to a study published online Sept. 19 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.